I’ve been on an odyssey lately, time-traveling back to
graduate school in Philadelphia, to Aesthetics course with Dr. Carrow, to my
most profound “Aha!” moment reminded to me today by one of my best research papers ever. This "Aha!" moment occurred when I learned about the Golden
Mean, a magical proportion that is eerily found all over in nature, but also applied
to art, architecture, literature, and music in some cases before the ancient Greeks. Find
the Golden Mean in the natural organization of sunflower seeds, the spiral of a
conch shell, leaves, the Parthenon in Greece, playing cards, climaxes in drama,
and the music of Béla Bartók and others.
The parts of my Golden Mean research paper, including manually-typed text, hand-drawn charts showing forms of the music, hand-manuscript lists of scales Bartok used, and complete bibliography. |
The Golden Mean can also be found in art. For example, a
Golden Rectangle can be seen in George Seurat’s “Invitation to a Sideshow” or “La
Parade de Cirque” (1807-8). We call it a Golden Rectangle because the
relationship of the short side of the rectangle to the long side is the Golden
Mean proportion. In this painting, there are Golden Rectangles within the
painting (notice the background) that have Golden Mean relationships with the
other rectangles. A reproduction of this painting hung in my band room in high school and I thought I knew it by heart. Then I learned about the Golden Mean and...Aha!
How many Golden Rectangles can you find? |
Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, and Brahms probably did not use
the Golden Mean purposefully even though many music theorists have attempted to
prove through complicated graphs and charts that they did. I suggest that the
common first-movement form of their day, sonata-allegro form, easily relates to
the Golden Mean because it is a pleasing proportion, so it’s there, but not
on-purpose. J.S. Bach was very interested in numbers, so it’s possible that
some of his preludes and fugues from the Well-Tempered
Clavier were created with this proportion in mind, but we just don't know for sure.
We do know
twentieth-century composers tinkered with the Golden Mean, or sometimes based every miniscule
aspect of their compositions on it, because it was discussed in their writings
and ever-so-obvious in their modern compositions. Check out Luigi Nono’s and Karlheinz
Stockhausen’s (above) music, for example, and then try to tell me you enjoyed listening
without understanding what was going on. Béla Bartók’s
music appealed to me—balanced, tasteful, and generally aesthetically pleasing—even
before I understood the Golden Mean and its companion, the Fibonacci Series.
So what is this Golden Mean? The Golden Mean is the proportion where the larger part of
something relates to the whole the same as the smaller part relates to the
larger. (The small to large is the same proportion as large to whole. Got it?) The
proportion was first proposed by Chaldeans in the third century BC, and then
was used by the Greeks. Nobody talked about it much or used it until Pacioli used
it at the end of the fifteenth century (in the Renaissance). He called it the “divine
proportion.”
The Fibonacci Series was discovered about 1202 by Leonardo
of Pisa, son of Bonaccio (“Filius Bonacci” or “Fibonacci” for short). In this
series, the numbers are defined in terms of previous numbers:
FIBO(n) = FIBO(n-1) + FIBO(n-2) for n>2
In other words, if you look at the series of numbers, each
equals the sum of the two that precede it, after you pass ‘1’ (1, 1, 2, 3, 5,
8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89…). Surprise! The Fibonacci Series is an approximate
representation of the Golden Mean in natural numbers.
As I mentioned before, the Golden Mean and Fibonacci Series
have been used extensively by 20th-century composers, including Karlheinz
Stockhausen (especially in his time signatures and note durations, see video above), Luigi Nono ( with pitches and
pitch relationships), and Béla Bartók.
Hungarian music theorist Ernö Lendvai applied the Golden Mean concept to Bartók’s
works and found that many of his forms correspond to this proportion. For
example, the recapitulations of the first movements of the Sonata for Two Pianos and Percussion (see video below this paragraph), Contrasts (see the video beneath that one which features Benny Goodman, Joseph Szigeti and the composer!), and some of the Mikrokosmos
occur exactly at the Golden Mean. (The recapitulation is where the listener
hears the material from the beginning of the piece again, and is therefore a
very important spot.)
Bartók also uses the Golden Mean to come up with his basis
of tonality, although this is harder to identify by listening without a score. He established his three basic scales from the Golden Mean
proportion applied to tonal music and used them to organize many of his compositions:
Golden
Section Scale: C Eb F Ab
Acoustic
Scale: C D E F# G A Bb
Octatonic
Scale: C D Eb F F# G# A B (alternating whole- and half-steps)
Bartók also used the Fibonacci numbers in compositions. The
form of Music for Strings, Percussion and
Celeste is a good example of this with sections of 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, and
89 measures. Listen to the following video when you've got some time to get lost in a half-hour's worth of music.
I could go on for pages (screens) on Bartók’s use of the
Golden Mean and Fibonacci Series, but I won’t. If you are interested in
learning more, get your hands on Lendvai’s classic book, Béla Bartók:
An Analysis of his Music, which is a smooth read and likely to be
found in most libraries with a decent music collection.
So here’s my point: back in Aesthetics class I spent hours
analyzing music looking for Golden Mean and Fibonaccian proportions only to
discover that most music I found was not made better by strict, academic adherence
to it. It may provide a formal (as in ‘pertaining to form,’ not ‘wearing a
tuxedo’) balance, a way to unify a composition, and a topic for scholarly
discourse. Bartók’s music is the exception, for me, because it is sonically
interesting, aesthetically pleasing, and unique compared to the work of his
contemporaries. Learning that he used Golden Mean and Fibonaccian proportions
still enhances the listening experience for me because I was drawn to this
music from the moment I first heard it.
No comments:
Post a Comment